Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
brigdh: (archaeology)
[personal profile] brigdh
This summer, I'm teaching the 'Introduction to Archaeology' course at my university. I am super excited! I've TA'd this class four times (TA'ing in the sense of actually lecturing, not just being a grader), so I'm excessively familiar with it, but this is the first time I've gotten to be completely in charge: picking out the textbook, deciding what topics to cover, writing the syllabus, everything! I LOVE IT.

However, the actual process of writing a syllabus has made me realize what an enormously broad topic "Introduction to Archaeology" is. It's basically four courses in one: 1) the entirety of human history, including pre-human ancestors (quite a broad topic by itself); 2) how to do archaeology (field techniques, dating methods, etc); 3) archaeological theories that can be used in interpretation (gender, Marxism, structuralism, environmental archaeology, etc); 4) the history of archaeology as a subject, including modern consequences of archaeology (topics like NAGPRA, for example). That is way too much for 24 sessions, especially once you subtract sessions for the midterm, final, and introduction. Thankfully, having TA'd this course with four different professors, I know that we're allowed to basically pick whatever we think is the most interesting and focus on that. But sometimes decisions are really hard to make! Which is why I come to you, o LJ. For reference, most of the students who take this course tend not to be archaeology majors, but come from all departments- music, acting, biology, math, law, pre-med- you name it, I've had a student in it. In addition, they're letting some pre-college (i.e., high school) students sign up for the summer semesters.


[Poll #1740795]

Also, yes, I know the problems with the term 'civilization', but LJ polls do not allow enough characters to get into the whole thing about urbanization vs increased political complexity vs population increase vs writing as information storage vs the possibility of heterarchy as deliberate resistance to hierarchy, ETC ETC ETC, so basically I just mean the 'big name' cultures people think of when they think of archaeology.

Date: 2011-05-12 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hab318princess.livejournal.com
gone for three in depth....


but what i really want is to be in these classes (my first career idea was archaeology - which would be wrong for me as I'm neither patient nor do I like being outside for any length of time...) but I would love to do this - instead I'll be sitting in an office in a hospital (which is a much better career choice)

Date: 2011-05-12 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
Ha, archaeology is definitely not the smartest career choice. But I love it! Although I also think it would be pretty cool to work in a hospital.

Date: 2011-05-12 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hab318princess.livejournal.com
I'm a very good armchair archaeologist (love the UK TV programme Time Team - they do a dig over 3 days - with proper recording before and after etc - much more background work going on than we see during the three days condensed to about 50 minutes TV programme) but yeah, the NHS has drawn me in... I started out as a 'normal' secretary but have spent a big part of my working life in the NHS

I was given a book as a kid about old civilisations and still remember seeing the picture of the Ishtar Gate... it was a humungous kick to see the gate then for real in a (then) East German Museum in Berlin in 1988 - still a highlight for me

Profile

brigdh: (Default)
brigdh

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 08:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios