I'm planning on buying a new computer next month, as mine is dying a slow and ignoble death. But! Here is my problem:
I've been convinced by all you mac-adherents out there to buy a mac. However, for my work I need a database program. Not a complicated one (at the moment I'm just using Access '94), but it does need to be an actual database and not just a spreadsheet, and therefore Excel or Numbers aren't good enough. The mac version of Office doesn't come with Access, and apparently there is no Mac Access available, and the guy at the Mac store didn't know of a similar substitute. But he (and I) thought there must be one. So, people who know more than I, are there easy Mac database programs available?
Alternately, I know that you can now buy Macs that run Windows OS, which would solve the problem. But I heard that Vista Office also doesn't include Access, and if I have to buy a new computer, and Windows, and a Pro version of Office, I will be unhappy.
Advise me!
I've been convinced by all you mac-adherents out there to buy a mac. However, for my work I need a database program. Not a complicated one (at the moment I'm just using Access '94), but it does need to be an actual database and not just a spreadsheet, and therefore Excel or Numbers aren't good enough. The mac version of Office doesn't come with Access, and apparently there is no Mac Access available, and the guy at the Mac store didn't know of a similar substitute. But he (and I) thought there must be one. So, people who know more than I, are there easy Mac database programs available?
Alternately, I know that you can now buy Macs that run Windows OS, which would solve the problem. But I heard that Vista Office also doesn't include Access, and if I have to buy a new computer, and Windows, and a Pro version of Office, I will be unhappy.
Advise me!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:43 pm (UTC)And macs are more expensive than most PCs, but not that dramatically. The one I'm looking at getting is $1000.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 09:25 pm (UTC)In the end it's all up to personal preference, and what you need. Smart shopping, and thinking ahead is always the best option, and it seems that you have that in your back pocket already.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:25 pm (UTC)If you're all geeky and want to install Linux on your Mac, you could get MySQL (both open-source: the hassle comes in figuring out how to install them).
ETA: and I don't know why the fuck the Mac guy didn't know about FMP, unless they've stopped making it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:39 pm (UTC)I did try to use MySQL, but couldn't figure out how to install. I hadn't realized you had to be running Linux. Which I suppose would have helped. Hee.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:43 pm (UTC)FMP is decent if what you want is a reasonably simple database. We had an incredibly complicated database powered by it, but it was plagued with errors, mostly created because the original maker of the db didn't realize the extent to which it would be used and how many records we'd have in it - however, that's a lot like Access. If you're going to need something that has many, many records in it with lots of interrelating tables, or will have lots of people connecting to it, going the MySQL way would probably be better.
a quick google shows that installing MySQL on Mac is reasonably straightforward (http://developer.apple.com/internet/opensource/osdb.html), although I know it takes a bit to learn the SQL statements and usages. (but once you learn them, you can use a lot of different databases with less of a learning curve.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:08 pm (UTC)I'm tempted by MySQL though, if just because it would make me feel geeky and cool. XD
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:26 pm (UTC)I've never used any of them though, so I don't know which ones are good and which ones are crap and which ones are easy to use and which ones just think they are.
Filemaker Pro is the one that I've heard of though, so I assume it's the Access equivalent.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:41 pm (UTC)I've never used a database program. But, two things. First, if Filemaker Pro turns out to be what you need, I may have an unused copy around here somewhere. Second, a good resource for checking what may be available is http://www.versiontracker.com. It covers everything from the big commercial apps to freeware, and a search through it can usually give you a good feel for what might be useful to you. In the Mac world your choices are narrower than on the Windows side, obviously, so this is less of a PITA than you might expect -- it can be fun, and you can find yourself with freeware that does the job you expected to have to pay money for.
Finally, I see no reason why you'd need Vista. All the Intel-based Macs -- that is to say, all the ones now being made -- will run Windows, and I see no reason to think they wouldn't run XP just as happily as Vista. So you should be able to keep your current software and just transfer it to your new machine.
I see someone upthread is complaining about how expensive the machines are. They are pricey compared to Windows computers, but once again I note that I'm sitting here with a 2000 laptop I have not yet had to replace. In the long term, they may actually be cheaper, despite the higher upfront investment. -- But that wasn't what I started out to say. What I started out to say was that you might want to check the Apple online education store, which may offer you a significant discount for being an NYU grad student. Also, you might want to follow http://dealmac.com, which posts significant discounts on Mac systems whenever their staff sees them.
Or you might want to just buy a computer and get this over with. I so wouldn't blame you. Otherwise you could easily turn out like me, and be planning on buying a new computer, oh, how about the 18th of Never? Does Never work for you?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:14 pm (UTC)Filemaker Pro seems to be the standard answer, though there so many other options I'm sure at least one of the freeware programs will meet my needs.
I'm sure I could run Windows XP on a new mac- the problem would be convincing a computer store to upload it for me. I feel like they like to encourage new versions of anything to the point of making it difficult to get older copies, and as I don't have an installation CD of XP myself, I would need their help.
And oh! I almost forgot about the student discounts (since the real plan here is to talk my parents into buying it for me for Christmas). Thanks so much for that reminder.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:50 pm (UTC)http://www.bentotrial.com/preview/
If you're just doing access level work, this looks like it should work well. Plus it looks like it integrates with the other applications which is always nice. And it appears to be cheap.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:24 pm (UTC)That should be easier to import and you shouldn't loose any data.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:00 pm (UTC)Also finally friending you, if I may?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:22 pm (UTC)And of course you may!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:01 pm (UTC)http://rm.livejournal.com/1224312.html
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:05 pm (UTC)I'm using the Windows version, but they do have a Mac port. Also: open source and free.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:32 pm (UTC)I'm also a diehard Mac lover/user, although finances may necessitate purchasing a PC when my beloved PowerBook does eventually die. I'd only EVER use Macs if money weren't an issue.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 04:41 pm (UTC)Well, if macs last longer than PCs (which I keep hearing they do), the price difference may work out in the end.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-07 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-07 11:33 pm (UTC)