Things That Are Annoying Me Currently
Apr. 1st, 2007 07:14 pm1. People, if you are going to post to a community which has a membership in the thousands and which is orientated towards somewhat vaguely polished products rather than off-the-cuff remarks, maybe you could... I don't know... run fucking spellcheck on your posts. Particularly
crack_van. I cannot believe anyone would attempt to recommend someone else's work with an incoherent, punctuation-less run-on sentence.
2. I've read two historical books in a row now where characters were described as "cousins" and who I therefore assumed were not suitable romantic partners for one another. In both books, of course, these characters ended up in love.
Oh, changing definitions of incest. How you freak me out.
Also, I could do without the random antisemitism, you same books.
3. Sitting around before the-class-that-really-annoys-me started, I vaguely listened to two classmates discussing some of the articles we'd read this week, but didn't pay much attention because I was doing something else. "Oh, I hope you didn't criticize that article too much in your paper! The professor really likes him; I've heard her go on and on about him previously," one said. "Really? That's good to know," the other replied.
I didn't think much about this until around an hour later, when the same article came up in discussion. When prompted by a request for any other comments on it, the second girl replied, "I just enjoyed reading this article so much. I found his writing to be utterly clear and comprehensible, and his ideas were so interesting. I just... really enjoyed reading it."
PEOPLE. I AM PRETTY MUCH QUOTING DIRECTLY. I JUST- WHAT. First of all, who even says something like that? Secondly, I wonder if such express obsequiousness causes one to hate themselves. I can only hope.
Things That Are Not Annoying Me, But Are, In Fact, Awesome: I have a new coffeshop with free wifi! And it is way closer to me than the previous ones I've been going to. Hooray!
2. I've read two historical books in a row now where characters were described as "cousins" and who I therefore assumed were not suitable romantic partners for one another. In both books, of course, these characters ended up in love.
Oh, changing definitions of incest. How you freak me out.
Also, I could do without the random antisemitism, you same books.
3. Sitting around before the-class-that-really-annoys-me started, I vaguely listened to two classmates discussing some of the articles we'd read this week, but didn't pay much attention because I was doing something else. "Oh, I hope you didn't criticize that article too much in your paper! The professor really likes him; I've heard her go on and on about him previously," one said. "Really? That's good to know," the other replied.
I didn't think much about this until around an hour later, when the same article came up in discussion. When prompted by a request for any other comments on it, the second girl replied, "I just enjoyed reading this article so much. I found his writing to be utterly clear and comprehensible, and his ideas were so interesting. I just... really enjoyed reading it."
PEOPLE. I AM PRETTY MUCH QUOTING DIRECTLY. I JUST- WHAT. First of all, who even says something like that? Secondly, I wonder if such express obsequiousness causes one to hate themselves. I can only hope.
Things That Are Not Annoying Me, But Are, In Fact, Awesome: I have a new coffeshop with free wifi! And it is way closer to me than the previous ones I've been going to. Hooray!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 01:24 am (UTC)Here's a horrible admission: I can see where the history of Marxist interpretations of linguistic theory might in fact be pretty interesting. Enjoyable, even, if the writing were good enough. But something about your story suggests to me that your classmate would be unable to back up her praise in any intelligible way, if called on it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 01:50 am (UTC)I'd certainly give it interesting. And in any other circumstances, I probably wouldn't have found the choice of 'enjoyable' so strange. But the whole concept of making yourself ingratiating in such a way boggles me. I can see not picking something utterly to pieces if you know another person in the discussion is fond of it (if not to be polite, then just because they might have thought more about it than you and therefore might have better reasoned arguments), but deliberately inventing praise seems so alien to me. And I want to believe that it wouldn't work, because surely by graduate school one is expected to do more than parrot the professors' tastes? But alas, I cannot count on this professor being put off by such a thing.