Random thoughts
Feb. 15th, 2007 06:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I finally managed to force myself to start writing that paper at around 1am last night. By 3:30, I'd written all six pages of it, around 1,700 words. I... did not know I was capable of that. I had assumed I just wouldn't be sleeping last night, but I suppose this is far preferable, if surprising.
I've decided that the issue I have with this linguistics anthropology class (and possibly all cultural anthropology!), is that everything is either so entirely abstract and vague that it could be applied to anyone anywhere, and thus is almost meaningless, or is so context- and culturally- specific that it can't work outside of this one place and moment in time. And then people try to use either set of evidence as a way to generalize about people's thoughts, and it makes me flail and go No! You can't know that! You're just guessing! It's certainly interesting to say "every speech act is intended to do more than one thing", but where do you go then? You can't set up any general theory of social meaning off of that, and so I never have anything to say. I want proof and statistics and graphs! I want to talk about which models best fit the physical evidence! Which clearly is why I'm in archaeology instead, and I suppose at least now I know.
Anyway,
louiselux posted a link to the Gender Genie, which can supposedly guess your gender based on a sample of your writing. I've been playing around with it, and the different results that come up are insteresting. This paper was very male (M:2786/F:1400), my last livejournal post was slightly male (M:723/F:699), but my last story was pretty female (M:695/F:1106). Which clearly proves that, when speaking in my own voice, I'm a guy, but Richard is a girl*.
Or something.
Currently I'm wasting a few hours before I go out to meet people for karaoke (yeah, I don't know, it wasn't my idea). Given that I've finally written all these papers and so on, I will have free time this weekend! I'm excited. I have interesting posts I've been thinking about and planning, and can take a look at the stories I've got half-finished, and hopefully polish them off. Plus, Remix assignments come out on Saturday! I'm all anxious.
*After I thought of that joke, of course I had to stick the only piece of Alec-POV I've written into the system to see what would happen. Though it was too short to work well, Alec is apparently male (M:232/F:155). Ha!
I've decided that the issue I have with this linguistics anthropology class (and possibly all cultural anthropology!), is that everything is either so entirely abstract and vague that it could be applied to anyone anywhere, and thus is almost meaningless, or is so context- and culturally- specific that it can't work outside of this one place and moment in time. And then people try to use either set of evidence as a way to generalize about people's thoughts, and it makes me flail and go No! You can't know that! You're just guessing! It's certainly interesting to say "every speech act is intended to do more than one thing", but where do you go then? You can't set up any general theory of social meaning off of that, and so I never have anything to say. I want proof and statistics and graphs! I want to talk about which models best fit the physical evidence! Which clearly is why I'm in archaeology instead, and I suppose at least now I know.
Anyway,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Or something.
Currently I'm wasting a few hours before I go out to meet people for karaoke (yeah, I don't know, it wasn't my idea). Given that I've finally written all these papers and so on, I will have free time this weekend! I'm excited. I have interesting posts I've been thinking about and planning, and can take a look at the stories I've got half-finished, and hopefully polish them off. Plus, Remix assignments come out on Saturday! I'm all anxious.
*After I thought of that joke, of course I had to stick the only piece of Alec-POV I've written into the system to see what would happen. Though it was too short to work well, Alec is apparently male (M:232/F:155). Ha!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:51 pm (UTC)I like hearing about your classes -- you get all the Oh, that's nifty and none of the papers.
Ahh! Remix! I'm dreading Saturday and horribly impatience at the same time.
Hee. Richard is so a girl.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:30 am (UTC)Really? I figured mentioning them must be terribly boring, at least without more context; I was just trying to articulate something that had been bothering me. But I'm so pleased to hear you find it interesting.
Isn't it terrible? I want to get the assignment so that I can start working, and yet I'm so afraid of getting someone that will be difficult. Pretty much the same way I feel before every assigned ficathon like this, really.
Squee! Have you read it, then?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 07:06 am (UTC)Yes, I just finished it. And if I were still adopting new narrators, I would so write Richard. Alec is a great character, but Richard... I think he has the potential to be an almost Tsuzuki-scale love. And the universe is fabulous -- injustice, indifference and decay are such kinks of mine. I don't want to read the sequels -- the ending satisfied me -- no, what I want now is fanfic. Or I would, if remix weren't only hours away.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 07:13 pm (UTC)I've been complaining about Remix anxiety to a whole crowd of people for the last few days, so I think these nerves must be normal. And I did the over-thinking thing last year, so I can only hope that this time around things seem less complicated. But now! The assignments could come at any moment. It's terrible.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 07:56 pm (UTC)The assignments could come at any moment
I know. It's dreadful. I'd hoped to sleep in long enough to avoid this, but, no, now I've just got to sit here and jitter.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:14 am (UTC)Is this a reasonable place for me to admit that I'm all envious of
I was going to say that you shouldn't be as anxious as the rest of us, because (again, unless I missed something, which is entirely possible with 300+ signups) you have a 50% chance of knowing who you're going to draw. The only reason I hesitate now is that if I were doing the matchups, or the algorithm for matchups, I'd try to avoid having pairs of writers assigned to each other. Which would mean
Not that I'd want you to think that I'm overthinking this or anything.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:42 am (UTC)But yes, that's the same place where I become uncertain. If I get sorted into Swordspoint fandom, I must get
Currently though, I'm worrying over whether it'll be worth bothering to keep up the anonymity if
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:42 am (UTC)It's times like this when I regret not qualifying for remix. Then I remember how freaked out it would make me, and I figure that I dodged a bullet.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:04 am (UTC)Heh. I like it, though it does seem to create a bit more angst than the average ficathon. But there's always next year to sign-up and worry with the rest of is!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:52 am (UTC)hey, speaking of Richard and the dance fic problem -- would Alec ever(especially early on) think it was funny to drop some drug or otherinto Richard's drink? And if so, would Richard forgive him?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:03 am (UTC)Hmmmm. I think Alec would, in general, think it was funny to get people drunk and/or drugged. But if he knew Richard disliked that loss of control, to deliberately bypass Richard's consent seems crueler or more trust-breaking than Alec seems to go for.
Also, now that I think about it, Alec seems to be more about provoking people into breaking their own boundaries than doing things to anyone. So I don't think he would, unless he was actually trying to make Richard angry at him. And though I don't know if Richard would never, ever forgive him, I think he'd be really upset.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:18 am (UTC)The thing is, if he thinks it was Alec, I'm inclined to think that the relationship is over before it starts. There isn't much I don't believe he'd forgive, but that? Never, never, never.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:29 am (UTC)You'd certainly have to clear up the confusion before the end of the story; it wouldn't work at all to have Richard just continuing on thinking Alec had drugged him. But I'd think you could use it for just long enough to start a fight and/or get the plot moving. You could even twist it as a moment of trust, if you could get Alec disturbted enough to say, 'No, I would never do that', or just had him worried over Richard's safety.
(Also, we're talking about early relationship in terms of the first few weeks, not the very first night they meet, in case that makes a difference.)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 01:50 am (UTC)It still strikes me as difficult, though. Even if we're talking about a few weeks in rather than a few days in, there hasn't been time to build up much of a reservoir of trust. And this would be a big, big deal. So I'd think that both the obvious ways it could play out would be problematic, in story terms. Either the confusion/misidentification is cleared up instantly, in which case the story isn't about Richard thinking Alec has drugged him at all, or else it isn't, in which case I'm thinking that at best, Alec is going to have to work very hard to even get an opportunity to clear things up.
This is a guy who doesn't even drink to the point where he can feel an effect from it. Being drugged, I have to suspect, would be something that at best would have him cutting off a relationship with no further discussion. And that's if he didn't kill the offender just to make sure it wouldn't happen again.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 02:21 pm (UTC)The analogy that springs immediately to my mind is that of drivers using cell phones. Lots of pretty decent drivers will do that, and will even protest bitterly if proposals are made to stop them from doing it. Research indicates that it does have a real and nontrivial impact on driving performance, and, crucially, that the impact is associated with the cognitive demands of talking on the phone, so that hands-free sets don't really help. But your average decent driver isn't aware of that, and will often react with some indignation to the idea that she's doing something with that phone that isn't safe.
But the very best drivers I know, including the one who drives racing cars, unanimously refuse to touch the things, even in the simplest and least threatening traffic conditions. And it turns out to be precisely because they're such good drivers: they're aware enough of what they're doing at all times that they're also aware of the impact on their driving of trying to talk on the phone at the same time. Of course they're safer doing it than any of the people who don't feel themselves to be impaired at all when using the phone, but they can tell the difference. So they don't, even if they might like to if the impairment weren't a factor.
(At least with the race car driver, I'm not even theorizing from observed behavior; I happened to be with him when he got a phone call from his brother, who was driving and using a cell phone, and therefore got the benefit of both him telling his brother to stop that at once and call him when he wasn't trying to drive, and his rant afterward about cell phones and driving. It was interesting, and after that I started seeing the pattern and asking other drivers about it. Anecdotal, yes, but there was a perfect correlation in my sample between quality of driving and willingness to use a cell phone while doing it.)
All of which is to say, I don't think one needs to posit any traumatic experience with alcohol, or the kind of dislike of its effects that would have kept him from drinking if he'd been, say, a painter instead. But the intersection between his nature and what he does makes it inevitable in his own universe.
Or at least, so it seems to me; but that hardly puts the question beyond dispute. After all, I did start all of this off by saying that I'm not going to rule out a writer being able to convince me otherwise, at least for the purposes of a given story. And I meant it.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 09:24 pm (UTC)All I can say now is, dude, next time I'm not arguing until after the story is written. If then. Because shooting down a promising storyline? So not what I came to LJ for.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 06:21 am (UTC)