Reading Thursday
Dec. 21st, 2017 12:40 pmWhat did you just finish?
What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America by Thomas Frank. A nonfiction book attempting to explain the upswing in conservative voters in the midwest and other rural areas. It's a bit out of date; it was published only in 2004 but things change fast in the politics game. Nonetheless, this book is pretty amazingly prescient; a lot of his discussion of conservative Republicans choosing to vote for their values (pro-life and anti-gay marriage in particular) against their own economic self-interest could apply perfectly to the Trump tax bill that passed just yesterday.
Frank focuses on Kansas because it's his home state, but it also makes for a very interesting case study. Although these days it's almost a byword for conservatism (perhaps moreso in 2004, when the Kansas School Board had recently declared all students must be taught 'evolution is a theory, not a fact'), it once had an equally radical liberal history: Bloody Kansas, John Brown, the Populist movement of the 1890s. Frank blames the shift on Democrats more-or-less abandoning their economic principles of supporting unions, New Deal-esque social welfare programs, high taxes for the rich and strict regulations for corporations. With little to distinguish between Democrats and Republicans in economic terms, the Republicans were able to corral the cultural backlash against the social changes of the last few decades into votes – which they promptly used not to actually repeal abortion or make profanity on TV illegal, but to pass taxes and deregulations that made the rich richer.
It's a sound enough argument. My one criticism of the book is that Frank doesn't address race at all. Or rather, he does bring it up once: to say that it's not a factor in Kansas. Which, uh. I've never been to Kansas, and certainly I don't remember race coming up particularly frequently in the pundit discussions of GWB's first election, but I find that hard to believe. Even if it was true at the time, it's certainly no longer true after Obama. Frank, in general, discounts all social issues compared to economic ones – race, feminism, lgbt rights, etc. And it's not that I don't agree that economics are important! But I think he's incorrect to reduce everything that could possibly fit under the category of 'civil rights' to province of "the self-righteous" (YES THAT IS AN ACTUAL QUOTE, WTF). Both sides can matter.
Anyway, like I said, it's a good book overall, even if I think Frank would benefit from considering stuff other than economics. Like, anything. Anything at all.
The Blood of Emmett Till by Timothy B. Tyson. A historical nonfiction about, well, look at the title. I've had my copy of this book for a year now, but I've only just gotten around to reading it. Real life has been so full of racist and depressing politics that I couldn't handle facing more of the same in my reading.
However, it turns out that The Blood of Emmett Till is more suspenseful than depressing. I mean, it's still about the violent murder of a 14-year-old child, don't get me wrong. It's not exactly light-hearted. But Tyson doesn't describe in detail what happened to Till after he was taken from his great-uncle's house until the last chapter. Instead most of the book is focused on recreating the wider cultural setting of the lynching, the personalities of the people involved, and the drama of the trial. There are some outright exciting stories in here, particularly one where reporters, lawyers, and activists go racing about rural Mississippi in disguise, hoping to find witnesses to help the prosecution.
I found the historical details to be the most fascinating part of the book. The Brown vs Board of Education decision had been handed down only the previous year, and rage against school desegregation and the possibility of interracial marriage was being actively flamed by various white supremacist groups. Two voting rights activists had been murdered (and a third shot who survived) nearby earlier that same summer; none of the cases were even investigated, much less tried. These events likely influenced Till's killers to attack him, and their belief that they would get away with it. Tyson also shows how Till's death helped the burgeoning civil rights movement. Many of the most famous names come up in the reaction and protests during and after the trial: Medgar Evers, Rosa Parks, Bayard Rustin, as well as events like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Greensboro Woolworth Lunch Counter Sit-ins.
It's an excellently written book with a page-turning quality nonfiction doesn't often have. I highly recommend it if you have the least interest in civil rights or America's racist history.
I read this as an ARC via NetGalley.
What are you currently reading?
Nothing yet! But I want to ask for recs: I’m in the mood for sci-fi, preferably of the space opera sort, with lots of alien species and bouncing around from one cool planet to the next. I want a fun and light book though, definitely nothing that could be described as military sci-fi. The Star Wars or Guardians of the Galaxy movies are good examples of what I want, but in a book. Basically I want the equivalent of those fics that are like ‘it’s our fave characters, but now they’re iiiiin spaaaaaaace!’.
The closest thing I can think of to what I’m looking for is Martha Wells’s Books of the Raksura, which is not space opera, but does have all the awesome worldbuilding with many cool species and tons of fantastic imaginative settings. So, more stuff like that, please!
Things I’ve already read and so you don’t need to rec them to me: the Vorkosigan Saga, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Dune, N.K. Jeminsin’s books, Octavia Butler’s Xenogenesis series, the Mars trilogy (all of KSR’s books, really), and The Left Hand of Darkness. Most of these are close to what I want, but way more serious than I’d like right now. I’m in the mood for fun!
What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America by Thomas Frank. A nonfiction book attempting to explain the upswing in conservative voters in the midwest and other rural areas. It's a bit out of date; it was published only in 2004 but things change fast in the politics game. Nonetheless, this book is pretty amazingly prescient; a lot of his discussion of conservative Republicans choosing to vote for their values (pro-life and anti-gay marriage in particular) against their own economic self-interest could apply perfectly to the Trump tax bill that passed just yesterday.
Frank focuses on Kansas because it's his home state, but it also makes for a very interesting case study. Although these days it's almost a byword for conservatism (perhaps moreso in 2004, when the Kansas School Board had recently declared all students must be taught 'evolution is a theory, not a fact'), it once had an equally radical liberal history: Bloody Kansas, John Brown, the Populist movement of the 1890s. Frank blames the shift on Democrats more-or-less abandoning their economic principles of supporting unions, New Deal-esque social welfare programs, high taxes for the rich and strict regulations for corporations. With little to distinguish between Democrats and Republicans in economic terms, the Republicans were able to corral the cultural backlash against the social changes of the last few decades into votes – which they promptly used not to actually repeal abortion or make profanity on TV illegal, but to pass taxes and deregulations that made the rich richer.
It's a sound enough argument. My one criticism of the book is that Frank doesn't address race at all. Or rather, he does bring it up once: to say that it's not a factor in Kansas. Which, uh. I've never been to Kansas, and certainly I don't remember race coming up particularly frequently in the pundit discussions of GWB's first election, but I find that hard to believe. Even if it was true at the time, it's certainly no longer true after Obama. Frank, in general, discounts all social issues compared to economic ones – race, feminism, lgbt rights, etc. And it's not that I don't agree that economics are important! But I think he's incorrect to reduce everything that could possibly fit under the category of 'civil rights' to province of "the self-righteous" (YES THAT IS AN ACTUAL QUOTE, WTF). Both sides can matter.
Anyway, like I said, it's a good book overall, even if I think Frank would benefit from considering stuff other than economics. Like, anything. Anything at all.
The Blood of Emmett Till by Timothy B. Tyson. A historical nonfiction about, well, look at the title. I've had my copy of this book for a year now, but I've only just gotten around to reading it. Real life has been so full of racist and depressing politics that I couldn't handle facing more of the same in my reading.
However, it turns out that The Blood of Emmett Till is more suspenseful than depressing. I mean, it's still about the violent murder of a 14-year-old child, don't get me wrong. It's not exactly light-hearted. But Tyson doesn't describe in detail what happened to Till after he was taken from his great-uncle's house until the last chapter. Instead most of the book is focused on recreating the wider cultural setting of the lynching, the personalities of the people involved, and the drama of the trial. There are some outright exciting stories in here, particularly one where reporters, lawyers, and activists go racing about rural Mississippi in disguise, hoping to find witnesses to help the prosecution.
I found the historical details to be the most fascinating part of the book. The Brown vs Board of Education decision had been handed down only the previous year, and rage against school desegregation and the possibility of interracial marriage was being actively flamed by various white supremacist groups. Two voting rights activists had been murdered (and a third shot who survived) nearby earlier that same summer; none of the cases were even investigated, much less tried. These events likely influenced Till's killers to attack him, and their belief that they would get away with it. Tyson also shows how Till's death helped the burgeoning civil rights movement. Many of the most famous names come up in the reaction and protests during and after the trial: Medgar Evers, Rosa Parks, Bayard Rustin, as well as events like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Greensboro Woolworth Lunch Counter Sit-ins.
It's an excellently written book with a page-turning quality nonfiction doesn't often have. I highly recommend it if you have the least interest in civil rights or America's racist history.
I read this as an ARC via NetGalley.
What are you currently reading?
Nothing yet! But I want to ask for recs: I’m in the mood for sci-fi, preferably of the space opera sort, with lots of alien species and bouncing around from one cool planet to the next. I want a fun and light book though, definitely nothing that could be described as military sci-fi. The Star Wars or Guardians of the Galaxy movies are good examples of what I want, but in a book. Basically I want the equivalent of those fics that are like ‘it’s our fave characters, but now they’re iiiiin spaaaaaaace!’.
The closest thing I can think of to what I’m looking for is Martha Wells’s Books of the Raksura, which is not space opera, but does have all the awesome worldbuilding with many cool species and tons of fantastic imaginative settings. So, more stuff like that, please!
Things I’ve already read and so you don’t need to rec them to me: the Vorkosigan Saga, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Dune, N.K. Jeminsin’s books, Octavia Butler’s Xenogenesis series, the Mars trilogy (all of KSR’s books, really), and The Left Hand of Darkness. Most of these are close to what I want, but way more serious than I’d like right now. I’m in the mood for fun!
no subject
Date: 2017-12-22 08:33 pm (UTC)