Reading Wednesday
Jul. 29th, 2015 08:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
brigdhWhat did you just finish?
Capitol Men: The Epic Story of Reconstruction Through the Lives of the First Black Congressmen by Philip Dray. I have such mixed feelings on this book. On the one hand, it's not that well written. Oh, it's not awful. But it reads like a high school textbook rather than narrative nonfiction; Dray doesn't pick a person, a topic, or a series of events to provide a guide-line through his book, but just gives a general summary of stuff that happened at vaguely the same time and vaguely the same place. Even his subtitle is inaccurate: of the seven black congressmen on the cover, two of them are mentioned literally once in the entire book, and that's during the preface when he's describing the cover. None of them get the sort of birth-to-death detail that you'd expect from a title with "through the lives". Instead the book is dominated by people such as President Grant, Frederick Douglass, Adelbert Ames (a white man, the Reconstruction governor of Mississippi), P.B.S. Pinchback (a black man, briefly governor of Louisiana), Robert Smalls (also a black congressman, but for some reason not included in the group on the cover), and Benjamin Tillman (a white supremacist who pioneered many of the tactics of what became Jim Crow). All of whom are certainly important figures during Reconstruction! But you know, if you're going to write narrative nonfiction, you need to be more selective than "everyone who did something important".
On the other hand, Dray's topic is so fascinating that it almost doesn't matter how he presents it. I mean, I know about Reconstruction, right? I am reasonably well-educated American. And yet this book was constantly shocking me. Did you know, for example, that in the South Carolina gubernatorial election of 1876, the Democrats were so determined to reclaim the state for white supremacy that they committed blatant election fraud ranging from merely stuffing ballot boxes to disrupting Republican campaigning efforts with paramilitary groups to the outright massacre of six black voters? Despite all of these efforts, the election was close enough that both parties declared themselves the winners. They both celebrated their own inaugurations, set up their own legislatures, and began to govern. President Grant sent a small delegation of federal troops to support the Republicans (who, you know, were not bragging about how they had broken election law), but that move proved so unpopular in both South Carolina and the North (it was seen as an "intervention of the military authority", which, like, I'M PRETTY SURE THE MILITARY IS SUPPOSED TO INTERVENE IF SOMEONE VIOLENTLY STEALS AN ELECTION) that the troops were eventually withdrawn and the Democratic candidate seized control.
And this was not an unusual event! There is account after account in this book of groups such as the Ku Klux Klan literally kicking elected officials out of their offices with violence and death threats and claiming them for themselves. Sheriffs, postmasters, mayors – no government position was too big or too small. And the federal government just... allowed this to happen!
Or did you know that there was a federal law, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, that made segregation on public transportation and in public accommodations (such as hotels and restaurants) illegal? It was overturned by the Supreme Court a mere eight years later, but seriously! Many of the exact same rights that were fought for in the 1950s and 60s had been already won, but then were erased and forgotten.
I don't know. This book just made me flail and splutter. I'm not entirely sure I recommend it, but I do wish the information in it was more widely known.
On an entirely different note, I also read Mated to the Meerkat by Lia Silver. A short romantic comedy about animal shifters (that is, sort of like werewolves but not wolves), Hollywood paparazzi, evil lawyers, and unusual foods. This book made me laugh out loud so many times; I want to post all my favorite lines, but unfortunately they mostly involve spoilers. Wait, here's one:
His brother Alex picked up the phone on the first ring. “Where are you? You haven’t called in days! What’s going on? The entire clan wants to know what’s up with you, Chance! It’s been fourteen hours since you updated your Instagram.”
Come on, that is hilarious. I think the book might work better if you're at least vaguely familiar with the paranormal romance genre, but even if you're not, you should read this. It absolutely made my day.
What are you currently reading?
Dry Bones by Craig Johnson. The 12th and last (well, last published so far) Walt Longmire book! I'll have to find a new lengthy series to start.
Capitol Men: The Epic Story of Reconstruction Through the Lives of the First Black Congressmen by Philip Dray. I have such mixed feelings on this book. On the one hand, it's not that well written. Oh, it's not awful. But it reads like a high school textbook rather than narrative nonfiction; Dray doesn't pick a person, a topic, or a series of events to provide a guide-line through his book, but just gives a general summary of stuff that happened at vaguely the same time and vaguely the same place. Even his subtitle is inaccurate: of the seven black congressmen on the cover, two of them are mentioned literally once in the entire book, and that's during the preface when he's describing the cover. None of them get the sort of birth-to-death detail that you'd expect from a title with "through the lives". Instead the book is dominated by people such as President Grant, Frederick Douglass, Adelbert Ames (a white man, the Reconstruction governor of Mississippi), P.B.S. Pinchback (a black man, briefly governor of Louisiana), Robert Smalls (also a black congressman, but for some reason not included in the group on the cover), and Benjamin Tillman (a white supremacist who pioneered many of the tactics of what became Jim Crow). All of whom are certainly important figures during Reconstruction! But you know, if you're going to write narrative nonfiction, you need to be more selective than "everyone who did something important".
On the other hand, Dray's topic is so fascinating that it almost doesn't matter how he presents it. I mean, I know about Reconstruction, right? I am reasonably well-educated American. And yet this book was constantly shocking me. Did you know, for example, that in the South Carolina gubernatorial election of 1876, the Democrats were so determined to reclaim the state for white supremacy that they committed blatant election fraud ranging from merely stuffing ballot boxes to disrupting Republican campaigning efforts with paramilitary groups to the outright massacre of six black voters? Despite all of these efforts, the election was close enough that both parties declared themselves the winners. They both celebrated their own inaugurations, set up their own legislatures, and began to govern. President Grant sent a small delegation of federal troops to support the Republicans (who, you know, were not bragging about how they had broken election law), but that move proved so unpopular in both South Carolina and the North (it was seen as an "intervention of the military authority", which, like, I'M PRETTY SURE THE MILITARY IS SUPPOSED TO INTERVENE IF SOMEONE VIOLENTLY STEALS AN ELECTION) that the troops were eventually withdrawn and the Democratic candidate seized control.
And this was not an unusual event! There is account after account in this book of groups such as the Ku Klux Klan literally kicking elected officials out of their offices with violence and death threats and claiming them for themselves. Sheriffs, postmasters, mayors – no government position was too big or too small. And the federal government just... allowed this to happen!
Or did you know that there was a federal law, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, that made segregation on public transportation and in public accommodations (such as hotels and restaurants) illegal? It was overturned by the Supreme Court a mere eight years later, but seriously! Many of the exact same rights that were fought for in the 1950s and 60s had been already won, but then were erased and forgotten.
I don't know. This book just made me flail and splutter. I'm not entirely sure I recommend it, but I do wish the information in it was more widely known.
On an entirely different note, I also read Mated to the Meerkat by Lia Silver. A short romantic comedy about animal shifters (that is, sort of like werewolves but not wolves), Hollywood paparazzi, evil lawyers, and unusual foods. This book made me laugh out loud so many times; I want to post all my favorite lines, but unfortunately they mostly involve spoilers. Wait, here's one:
His brother Alex picked up the phone on the first ring. “Where are you? You haven’t called in days! What’s going on? The entire clan wants to know what’s up with you, Chance! It’s been fourteen hours since you updated your Instagram.”
Come on, that is hilarious. I think the book might work better if you're at least vaguely familiar with the paranormal romance genre, but even if you're not, you should read this. It absolutely made my day.
What are you currently reading?
Dry Bones by Craig Johnson. The 12th and last (well, last published so far) Walt Longmire book! I'll have to find a new lengthy series to start.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 01:11 am (UTC)That is funny! I am ashamed to say that there are people who track me down if they haven't seen me on any of my usual online haunts in several hours.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 05:21 am (UTC)I keep typing out long comments and retracting them because I don't want to imply I know more about Reconstruction than I do (I actually know very little). But yes, I agree.
It's funny how differently that line reads to different people. The idea of being worried because someone hasn't updated a webpage in less than a day, or not called in three days, is so alien to me that I didn't even find that line funny. It's not unfunny, it just. . . kind of makes me shrug and look at it blankly.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 05:39 pm (UTC)Perhaps it works better in context, since the character's been set up as someone who's constantly checking his phone, fidgeting with things, talking, and just generally being curious and talkative and into everything.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-30 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-31 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-31 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-31 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-05 12:41 am (UTC)