Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
brigdh: (I need things on a grander scale)
[personal profile] brigdh
I'm doing that old talking meme, but for May! Feel free to ask me something here.

May 1st - what led you to choose archaeology as a career? for [livejournal.com profile] just_ann_now (I am already a day behind on this meme, go me!)

Ha, well, I didn't really choose archaeology so much as I fell into it. When I was applying to colleges, I– like most people, probably– had no idea what I wanted to do with my life. I chose archaeology as a major because history had always been my favorite subject in school, and archaeology just seemed like a more hands-on version of it. It has really worked out for me, though.

In the US (and maybe Canada also?), archaeology is generally studied as a branch of anthropology instead of as a branch of history, as it is in most other countries. Whether or not this actually means anything for archaeology itself is up for debate (a lot of people will argue there are fundamental differences in the approach of American archaeology and, say, European archaeology, but in my opinion this is one of those cases where there are more exceptions to the rule than adherents), but as a student, it means you end up taking a lot of anthropology classes. Which was awesome for me, as I turned out to really like them! Anthropology in the US is called "four field"; that refers to archaeology (obvs), cultural anthropology (what most people think of when you say "anthropology": the study of cultures and people), biological anthropology (the study of the human body and genetic diversity, human evolution, and primates), and linguistics. I love all of these topics, but archaeology appeals the most to me, as it combines the study of people (who are endlessly fascinating) with those people being dead and gone, so it's not as simple as just asking someone "what are you doing?" (which cultural anthropology occasionally gives me the sense of, unfortunately).

Archaeology also has allowed me to do a lot of traveling, which I love. It's a different sort of traveling than being a tourist; the shortest time I've spent anywhere for an excavation is six weeks, and it's often been much longer than that. (This isn't true of all sorts of archaeology, but it is of the academic sort I've done.) Spending six weeks somewhere gives you time to settle into a routine, to shop for groceries and deal with annoying wifi or phone access, to make friends, to be bored, to write and receive letters, to be recognized. It's a much different experience than being somewhere for only a few days or a week, and I've been very lucky to be able to do it in many different places.

Once I started grad school, I also started to teach and, luckily, it also turned out I really love to do that. I think archaeology is a great subject to teach; it interests a wide variety of people (Indiana Jones! Pyramids and UFOs! Mummies!) but also is really relevant to modern life, and addresses some of the big questions that are fun to speculate on, even if you're not a first-year philosophy student: where does our food come from? How do cities work? Does technology influence society, or does society influence technology? Where did status- gender, race, class, etc- come from and how is it enforced? Where do you draw the line between human and prehuman, and what is the most important difference? Granted, I've always taught Introduction to Archaeology, where you get to touch on lots of time periods and areas; if I was teaching something more specific I'd have to cover less.

But it's all been a lot of luck! When I was 17 I would have said I didn't want to be a teacher, for instance, and didn't have any particular interest in spending time in India. I'm glad I have, though.

Date: 2014-05-02 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] just-ann-now.livejournal.com
Thank you! When I was little (5th grade, maybe?) I wanted to be an underwater archeologist. The main flaws in that plan, though, were 1) I couldn't swim (even though I lived by the ocean), and 2) I was actually pretty afraid of the water. So that dream, like so many others, fell by the wayside. *sigh*

The "four field" concept sounds fascinating. I never took anthropology, but I minored in Geography and liked it a lot. Your comments about the benefits of longer stays are spot on. Spending six weeks somewhere gives you time to settle into a routine, to shop for groceries and deal with annoying wifi or phone access, to make friends, to be bored, to write and receive letters, to be recognized.

India! It's always fascinated me, and I'm really fortunate to have both friends who live there, and friends who've traveled there extensively ([livejournal.com profile] aliana1 is there right now, in fact.) So I get to enjoy it all vicariously.

Thanks for such a thoughtful reply!

Date: 2014-05-02 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rachel2205.livejournal.com
This is great! *Academic fist bump* What is your particular area of specialism?

Date: 2014-05-02 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
Ha, I have a friend who got his scuba-diving license in order to do some underwater archaeology, but never got around to it. (Mainly because there are not actually that many underwater sites under excavation.)

You're welcome! :)

Date: 2014-05-03 12:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dhampyresa.livejournal.com
This is super interesting! What kind of periods do you cover in Introduction to Archaeology?

Date: 2014-05-03 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
It depends on which professor wrote the syllabus that semester (we use a new syllabus each time, and the professors take turns writing it). I've had it cover almost all method and no history (that is, things like "how to excavate" or "how to do radiocarbon dating" instead of "Mayans" or "Pyramids"); I've had it focus almost entirely on early humans, so that literally the last day of class was something like "And then the Ice Age ended and farming and writing and cities were invented and pretty much everything you probably wanted to study"; I've had it do just the opposite, when the first day of class was "Okay, so there was evolution and cave paintings and stuff, we've skipping all that and starting around 5000 BCE".

My preference (and how I did it when I got a turn to write the syllabus) is to do a bit of everything- that is, do human evolution, the spread of humans around the globe, beginnings of farmings around the globe, and then skip around to cover a few complex civilizations (I did Mayans and Harappans, because I know them the best, and then had the students each chose another and do a presentation of it).

Date: 2014-05-03 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
*fist bump!* I do Bronze Age South Asia. What do you do?

Date: 2014-05-03 10:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rachel2205.livejournal.com
Exciting! I'm several centuries and a continent away from you - I'm a lecturer in late medieval history :)

Date: 2014-05-05 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
Oh, cool! I have a couple of friends who do early medieval. I'm very jealous of you, getting to have texts. :)

Profile

brigdh: (Default)
brigdh

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 06:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios