LJ vs Dreamwidth
May. 10th, 2010 12:09 pmMy paid account for LJ has run out, and so I'm considering moving my money to Dreamwidth (though I will still have an LJ and cross-post here). What do you guys think? Those of you who have moved to Dreamwidth: do you like it? Any surprise advantages/disadvantages? Those of you who are deliberately staying on LJ (as apposed to staying on LJ out of laziness, which is my main motivation): what are your reasons?
I have to say, I'm finding the LJ ads- which I never had to deal with before- supremely annoying. Also, I want my 100+ plus icons back, so I'm going to be giving someone money soon. Help me decide!
I have to say, I'm finding the LJ ads- which I never had to deal with before- supremely annoying. Also, I want my 100+ plus icons back, so I'm going to be giving someone money soon. Help me decide!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 04:34 pm (UTC)But there are real advantages to DW. My favorite of these is that the system allows you to do much longer entries (people who manage to write long stories speak glowingly of being able to post them in a single entry), and more important, to write much longer comments. This is great for extended discussion -- there's a reason I've been posting all the meta over there rather than at LJ, and it's not that I'm hiding the unpopular opinions.
And the more LJ fails, the better I like DW's ethics. They stood up to the would-be anti-pr0n crusaders when it was a real problem for them to do it. They don't take advertising. When I have a technical question and raise it in my own journal, just asking whether it's something I should be worried about, damned if someone from their support/tech team doesn't show up and tell me precisely why I don't have to worry. I don't think they might snoop and make inappropriate and offensive comments on what are supposed to be locked posts; I don't have the nagging suspicion that they really want to be Facebook, and to sell our data to anyone who comes by who has a checkbook.
Finally, while I'm no judge of technical skill, they seem to have a tremendous amount of sheer competence going for them. Squeaky over at InsaneJournal has clearly had his heart in the right place, but the DW team has developed code that puts IJ's as well as LJ's to shame; they'd never tolerate the comment-rot problem that IJ had; they show every sign of wanting to continue to take the platform in interesting and useful directions.
Also, the community's smaller but very cool people are there, and there's a better chance of actually meeting them -- or so I've found. Not that the chance to be a quasi-BNF is affecting my evaluation or anything, no, not at all, never . . .
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 04:54 pm (UTC)As for surprise advantages-- more and more of my LJ flist who said they were staying with LJ when I left have since migrated (albeit sometimes to cross-posting to both rather than DW-only).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 06:08 pm (UTC)Also, I have to concur with
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 08:43 pm (UTC)The DW community is still small, which means feedback and discussion levels are on the low side. You can easily set up cross-posting with comments enabled if you want more of them, though. There is no scrapbook option, so if you don't have a personal site on which to store images, that could be inconvenient. The icon file size limit is either the same as LJ (40Kb) or only slightly larger (45-50Kb), but that's only a problem if you try to import animated icons from someplace like IJ, which allows up to 100Kb icons. For the most part, DW improves on LJ's advantages as a social networking tool, and eliminates its drawbacks. And the DW staff have already proven that they won't cave to pressure from groups trying to police legal content, even when holding to their principles means switching financial institutions multiple times.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-10 10:47 pm (UTC)I have Adblock and still am finding the ads annoying when I'm not logged in or whatever.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-11 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-15 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-17 09:19 pm (UTC)And yeah, I worry about how many people will follow me over to Dreamwidth, too. But at this point, I think at least half of the people I'm closest to are primarily posting at DW, which makes it tempting.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-01 09:49 pm (UTC)And awww. #^^# I'm all embarrassed now. But I will certainly keep posting on LJ in one way or another, no worries!