brigdh: (archaeology)
brigdh ([personal profile] brigdh) wrote2011-05-12 04:00 pm
Entry tags:

Help me make decisions!

This summer, I'm teaching the 'Introduction to Archaeology' course at my university. I am super excited! I've TA'd this class four times (TA'ing in the sense of actually lecturing, not just being a grader), so I'm excessively familiar with it, but this is the first time I've gotten to be completely in charge: picking out the textbook, deciding what topics to cover, writing the syllabus, everything! I LOVE IT.

However, the actual process of writing a syllabus has made me realize what an enormously broad topic "Introduction to Archaeology" is. It's basically four courses in one: 1) the entirety of human history, including pre-human ancestors (quite a broad topic by itself); 2) how to do archaeology (field techniques, dating methods, etc); 3) archaeological theories that can be used in interpretation (gender, Marxism, structuralism, environmental archaeology, etc); 4) the history of archaeology as a subject, including modern consequences of archaeology (topics like NAGPRA, for example). That is way too much for 24 sessions, especially once you subtract sessions for the midterm, final, and introduction. Thankfully, having TA'd this course with four different professors, I know that we're allowed to basically pick whatever we think is the most interesting and focus on that. But sometimes decisions are really hard to make! Which is why I come to you, o LJ. For reference, most of the students who take this course tend not to be archaeology majors, but come from all departments- music, acting, biology, math, law, pre-med- you name it, I've had a student in it. In addition, they're letting some pre-college (i.e., high school) students sign up for the summer semesters.


[Poll #1740795]

Also, yes, I know the problems with the term 'civilization', but LJ polls do not allow enough characters to get into the whole thing about urbanization vs increased political complexity vs population increase vs writing as information storage vs the possibility of heterarchy as deliberate resistance to hierarchy, ETC ETC ETC, so basically I just mean the 'big name' cultures people think of when they think of archaeology.

[identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com 2011-05-12 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'll definitely try to give them as wide a view as possible. We actually only have one session really focused on Europe (the day about "cave paintings"), though if I end up having them do presentations/papers, I'll probably let Minoan/Mycenaean culture be a choice. But we don't do Rome or Classical-era Greece or anything like that, and even Stonehenge will probably be five minutes in another context.

The ones I know the most about are the Harappans, Mayans, and Mesopotamians, but part of the problem is that there's very, very little 101-level stuff out there to give them on the Harappans. I hate to skip it, but it may make the most sense.

[identity profile] stardragonca.livejournal.com 2011-05-13 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
The ones I know the most about are the Harappans, Mayans, and Mesopotamians,

You are a Geek God. A tiny Geek God.