ext_1065 ([identity profile] p-zeitgeist.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] brigdh 2011-05-12 10:55 pm (UTC)

I vote for three in depth, because (1) in-depth allows you to present what's interesting about each one, while overviews are often too shallow by necessity to show what's really cool about the discipline and the subject; (2) I personally have always hated having to write papers with a passion for which I have no adequate words; and (3) doing in-depth looks gives you room to present the various analytical tools like Marxism in context, and with immediate illustrations of how they work in practice.

If I had a choice, I'd also vote for the civilizations being one American, one East Asian, and one West Asian/Northern African, but that's just me. I do realize you probably have no alternative to covering Egypt, even if Indus/Harappan might be more interesting.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting